News

Supreme Court hears arguments on free speech, social media

Published

on



The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case that could potentially limit what people post online.

source

26 Comments

  1. @user-rs4yn2co3s

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    Complete ban all sites its urgent

  2. @kylemonkiewicz2803

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    i got fired over a youtube comment yall have to much power

  3. @dragonf1092

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    Social media platforms should be charged and prosecuted under title 18 U.S.C. sections 241 conspiracy against rights and 242 deprivation of rights under color of law. The justice department should also be sued for aiding and abetting social media platforms violating American citizens free speech rights. The constitution says freedom of speech not freedom from speech.

    U.C.C. 1-308 all rights reserved with extreme prejudice Freedom of speech.

  4. @sunSherifAhmDRose1QuIST

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    If you have some investigative journalists , you might want to investigate THE FACTS/ the statistics about if there is caused more and more cases of thyroid gland cancer since year 2008 when Facebook started to censor the "not-empowered" civilian citizens …
    Who is the one in political administration somewhere in west world, owning the stocks in BigPharma and is beeing helped financially by Facebook's censorship ? WHO ? UN ? EU ?

  5. @josephgallardo5842

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    I can't believe the stopping of free speech their would be no civil rights movement no suffrage movement no gay rights no unions no PTA and no CNN that Ted Turner created who created Tucker and Hannity be careful what you start he might come back to haunt you

  6. @allyhellkiller5535

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    You can silence my voice,you can't silence America's noose.

  7. @saltzmann1

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    We need to stop others from ever having the ability to chip away at our constitution.

    Freedom of speech is not having a Court judge give jail time to anyone voicing an opinion no matter who it's directed at.

    Freedom of speech is not being arrested or fined for profanity. A non-respectful remark is part of our freedom of speech.

    The right to bear arms was not meant to be Infringed upon or challenged by unreasonable regulations that restrict the power of the people against future conflicts.

    Things have gotten so bad we actually allow Police officers to pull us over and take all the cash we may have and keep it, without any crime being committed, it’s called civil forfeiture/highway robbery and it's legal. 

    It was we the people that created this government to uphold our Constitution but we allow it to be twisted or totally disregarded. We need to prosecute any and all infringements on our Constitution.

  8. @stwgoodbyecya

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    I mean it's just a rap verse, right? I guess we will never know who killed his wife a few months later.

  9. @dougbolling4538

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    Well Lady's , you better burn your Diary's Books for your secrets will convict you as criminals .

  10. @joehawk98

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    First off All the main Media, Google, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook & etc was paid for by US Tax dollars initially making it a public media. 1st Amendment Rights do apply to these media companies who many originated in the USA company called the CIA and NSA and etc. Whomever says otherwise is bought off and needs to be imprisoned on the grounds of espionage and treason. That includes supreme court judges.
    On top of that when I signed up for all those media's it was promised to me that we had freedom of speech. They broke their contract to The People when they changed the rules later. From what I heard they still get government funding which means they are owned by The People not Suckerbird or whatever they are called. That makes them Public Media. 1st Amendment does apply that being the case, if they only get $1 tax funding by The People they are public media not private!

  11. @mathieuperreault310

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    Wooooow. And what about women that joke about cutting penises off. Do they go to jail. That is bullshit.

  12. @shiragadwah7580

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    Arguing against free speech is an oxymoron

  13. @raegrilley7713

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    If they were to block the ability for him or others to say things like that would it necessarily stop them from doing things? If he were to shoot up a kindergarten would it stop him if he wasn’t able to post it. If anything, I believe that it would be worse for people to block hime because then people wouldn’t be warned and people wouldn’t be able to potentially talk him out of it.

  14. @ProfessorLogics

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    I just want someone to explain the difference between what he did vs. Eminem?

    … and don't say one was getting paid and the other was free, just like you don't have to pay for a rap album you don't have to click on that persons page. So? anyone?

  15. @BlackTarH

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    Trolling shouldn't be free speech.

  16. @JonniMartinez

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    Wow ! There's goes freedom of speech .. Thank you patriot act !

  17. @TheTrinidad23

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    When a person gets a divorce they have to give. Half of what they own to their spouse. And on top of that it is very expensive. He was probably pissed. He didn't mean it

  18. @kellerr13

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    I and all true Americans will not recognize any decisions the Fascist supreme Court decides on outside the normal limits of speech in person.

  19. @bumblebee62

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    There's too much we don't know.
    Did he bust her cheating?, anything less than a double justice killing isn't so bad.

    Now a guy can't even throw a fit about probably getting aids, and herpes from the destroyer sleeping next to you?

    But off to jail for the words.

    Because cheating spouses spread aids, but words are really what hurts us?

  20. @ZeroFace

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    It sounds like something Al Bundy would say to his wife Peg. Also It is free speech. The only one you cant threaten is the president of the United States. IF you FEAR FOR YOU LIFE, Get a restraining order and or a Gun. Don't make a law that Punishes everyone.

  21. @sporttrolling837

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    smoking is healthier then fascism… speak up or enjoy

  22. @Tinawisdom

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    But if you stop free speech then how would you catch people before they hurt someone do they think about that???

  23. @JadedVegas

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    This shouldn't even be in court. It's protected speech. If they make this illegal, this will change a great many things, and open doors to allowing even more of our freedoms to be shredded.

  24. @belladonnamorrison4146

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    so so wroung freedom of speech that bitch of a wife needed to let it go..

  25. @kellerr13

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    As usual, CNN is sensationalizing things and trying to stir up trouble with the general population.

    Social media is only the medium, and you have the same restrictions on it that you have if you say them in person. 

    Your rights end where the rights of others begin.  They have the right to feel safe in their person, and making threats against citizens in the United States violates their rights.

  26. @Silentsilky

    January 1, 2024 at 3:07 am

    Goodbye freedom of speech !!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

Exit mobile version