Politics
Lawrence: Justice Kavanaugh destroyed Trump immunity claim 25 years ago
After Special Counsel Jack Smith asked the Supreme Court to take up Donald Trump’s claims of presidential immunity, MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell analyzes a 25-year-old filing from Brett Kavanaugh that shoots down the legal arguments of the president who would go on to appoint him to the Supreme Court.
» Subscribe to MSNBC: https://www.youtube.com/msnbc
Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
MaddowBlog: https://www.msnbc.com/maddowblog
ReidOut Blog: https://www.msnbc.com/reidoutblog
MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com: https://www.msnbc.com/
Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: https://link.msnbc.com/join/5ck/msnbc-daily-signup
Find MSNBC on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/msnbc/
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MSNBC
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/msnbc
#MSNBC #BrettKavanaugh #SCOTUS
source
Politics
Psaki: It’s not just Trump’s curse. GOP put flawed candidates in tight races.
Jen Psaki explains that while a popular president may be able to carry a lackluster candidate with the help of local partisanship, the combination of Donald Trump’s abysmal public approval and deeply flawed Republican candidates appears to not only be tipping races toward Democrats, but also changing the minds of voters who might have previously voted Republican by reflex.
MS NOW: My Source for News, Opinion, and the World.
» Subscribe to MS NOW: https://www.youtube.com/@msnow
» Become an MS NOW Member! Join us here http://ms.now/membership
MS NOW is the go-to destination for domestic and international breaking news, and best-in-class opinion journalism. For more context and news coverage of the most important stories of our day click here: https://www.ms.now/
#Republicans #Democrats #Midterms
source
Politics
Peter Alexander: Facts ‘may be unflattering, but they are not fake’
“This is not normal. This is not business as usual. What’s happening right now is different.”
MS NOW’s Peter Alexander reacts after Trump barred reporters from MS NOW, CNN, and Politico from entering the White House.
MS NOW: My Source for News, Opinion, and the World.
» Subscribe to MS NOW: https://www.youtube.com/@msnow
» Subscribe to MS NOW’s We the People Newsletter for exclusive content from your favorite MS NOW anchors. Sign up now for free at https://ms.now/joinus
MS NOW is the go-to destination for domestic and international breaking news, and best-in-class opinion journalism. For more context and news coverage of the most important stories of our day click here: https://www.ms.now/
source
Politics
Bystander Who Told Floyd To Comply With Police Breaks Down On The Stand | Morning Joe | MSNBC
While on the witness stand in the murder trial of former police officer Derek Chauvin, bystander Charles McMillian breaks down during video replay of George Floyd calling for his mother. The panel discusses. Aired on 04/01/2021.
» Subscribe to MSNBC: http://on.msnbc.com/SubscribeTomsnbc
About Morning Joe with Joe Scarborough: Join Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski, and Willie Geist, for in-depth and informed discussions that help drive the day’s political conversation. Top newsmakers, Washington insiders, journalists, and cultural influencers, come together on Morning Joe for unparalleled insight and analysis around the day’s biggest stories.
MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, Meet the Press Daily, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House with Nicolle Wallace, Hardball, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and more.
Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com: http://on.msnbc.com/Readmsnbc
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter: http://MSNBC.com/NewslettersYouTube
Find MSNBC on Facebook: http://on.msnbc.com/Likemsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: http://on.msnbc.com/Followmsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: http://on.msnbc.com/Instamsnbc
#DerekChauvin #GeorgeFloyd #MSNBC
Bystander Who Told Floyd To Comply With Police Breaks Down On The Stand | Morning Joe | MSNBC
source
Politics
Nicolle and Aaron Sorkin: This is Trump’s ‘ultimate mind f***’
Aaron Sorkin wasn’t planning to make another movie about Facebook — until he met a whistleblower whose story he felt compelled to tell. In an expansive conversation with Nicolle Wallace, the Oscar- and Emmy-winning writer and director discusses his new film, The Social Reckoning, and the extraordinary power Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook wield over nearly 3 billion people — and the costly decisions that have shaped the platform’s impact on our lives, our politics and our democracy.
A follow-up to 2010’s The Social Network, Sorkin’s new film examines Facebook in the age of Trump, telling the story of whistleblower Frances Haugen’s decision to expose internal documents detailing misinformation and potential harms, while exploring an older Zuckerberg confronting the consequences of the technology he created. Sorkin explains why he chose to release the film ahead of the midterm elections and why he believes there is still room for optimism — if we are willing to act.
Wallace and Sorkin explore Zuckerberg’s immense influence, the decisions surrounding Facebook on January 6, the people inside the company who knew what was happening and remained silent, and why Wallace sees Zuckerberg as “bubble wrapped from reality.” They discuss the complicated empathy the film invites audiences to feel for Zuckerberg — and how that empathy can coexist with accountability for decisions that affect billions. Sorkin also shares the story of Zuckerberg’s former consigliere and their falling out, his reaction to Jeremy Strong’s portrayal of Zuckerberg (whom Sorkin calls “the best American actor under 50 years old”), and Facebook’s efforts to obtain the film’s script before its release. He reveals how the filmmakers prepared for potential legal challenges, including the threat of a lawsuit.
The conversation also examines Trump’s relationship with Zuckerberg, the former president’s attacks on the media despite his apparent appetite for attention from credible news organizations, and the essential role investigative journalism plays in holding powerful people and institutions accountable. Wallace and Sorkin discuss why Congress and the law continue to lag behind rapidly advancing technology, the consequences of leaving that power unchecked, and why the stakes for democracy could hardly be higher.
And in a moment that connects Sorkin’s celebrated work across generations, the conversation turns to A Few Good Men, Hegseth’s “illegal order” and the enduring importance of questioning authority. Wallace, who was inspired by Allison Janney’s portrayal of White House Press Secretary C.J. Cregg on The West Wing to imagine a future for herself in the White House, joins Sorkin in reflecting on the responsibilities of the press, the dangers of unchecked power and the choices that define our political moment.
From Facebook’s influence over billions of lives to Trump, whistleblowers, investigative journalism and the future of American democracy, Sorkin’s message is clear: We need to take democracy more seriously.
MS NOW: My Source for News, Opinion, and the World.
» Subscribe to MS NOW: https://www.youtube.com/@msnow
Become an MS NOW Member! Join us here http://ms.now/membership
MS NOW is the go-to destination for domestic and international breaking news, and best-in-class opinion journalism. For more context and news coverage of the most important stories of our day click here: https://www.ms.now/
#Trump #Facebook #MarkZuckerberg
source
Politics
Trump’s ‘McCarthy’ Plot CAPSIZES amid GOP midterm CRASH: Ari’s legal breakdown
President Trump’s DOJ is escalating its controversial probe in to Democratic Congresswoman Ilhan Omar. MS NOW’s Ari Melber reports and is joined by NYU’s Melissa Murray. (The Beat’s YouTube: https://ms.now/ari)
MS NOW: My Source for News, Opinion, and the World.
» Subscribe to MS NOW: https://www.youtube.com/@msnow
» Subscribe to MS NOW’s We the People Newsletter for exclusive content from your favorite MS NOW anchors. Sign up now for free at https://ms.now/joinus
MS NOW is the go-to destination for domestic and international breaking news, and best-in-class opinion journalism. For more context and news coverage of the most important stories of our day click here: https://www.ms.now/
#DOJ #IlhanOmar #subpoena
source
-
Other3 years ago
Economic crisis Predictions|Bloomberg Surveillance 11/08/202…
-
Other3 years ago
Suppers Around The World – Tasty Recipes Please recognize th…
-
Food3 years ago
Kardea Brown’s Cheesy Hash Brown Casserole | Delicious Miss Brown | Food Network
-
Politics3 years ago
Russia hawks to Putin apologists: GOP stonewalls Ukraine aid, Tucker Carlson’s trip to Moscow
-
Other3 years ago
Giada De Laurentiis Makes Pan-Fried Zucchini w/ Anchovy Vina…
-
News3 years ago
White House warns of Russia invasion in Ukraine before end of Olympics
-
Other3 years ago
Just how beginner Vivek Ramaswamy is gaining some Trump foll…
-
Sports3 years ago
Top 10 Saves from Week 13 of the 2021-22 NHL Season
-
Other3 years ago
MaxMara Spring/Summer 2013 FULL SHOW|Milan Fashion Week MFW|…
-
Politics3 years ago
George Conway: ‘Lying, intimidating, bullying. That’s Trump at his worst, and that’s Trump always’

@brad3378
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
We got him this time!
@boilerup9985
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
If SC finds for djt, then the SC will be totally irrelevant
@sydney13ism
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Let them grant immunity. Biden can then have Trump murdered.
@christinewolfrom3425
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
This is a shame
@dougmacpherson2610
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Brett Kavanaugh will respect his previous opinion the same way he declared that he would be governed by stare decisis when he was being confirmed by the Senate.
@dougmacpherson2610
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
So what. Kavanaugh will brazenly vote for his boss despite anything he wrote before.
@ronagoodwell2709
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Don't get too excited. Larry. Kavanaugh is a republican and, as such, can change his mind, 25 years or 25 minutes later. Why would you expect him to be consistent? You guys in the media are constantly over- or under -estimating these cut-rate demagogues.
@davidclark573
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Lawrence you forgot that republicans on the Supreme court keep changing their minds. Did you forget three justices saying Roe was already litigated and then went on to relitigate it. Well Kavanaugh will do the same with this situation because his fuhrer trump is involved.
@turkey0165
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Look, you leftist propagandist for Deep State can say anything you want, but your time is up and Donald Trump will be the 47th President Of The United Ststes!
@VirginiaKennedy-wg1ot
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Trump Supreme Court Appointees are afraid of coming across to the public their owned by Trump
@user-gs1fg7tf8k
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
He Cannot! Is Not, NoT COME 2 Power! They All Need 2 Go. Somehow?? Anybody?? Suggestions??
Stay Safe
@edwinbathke2302
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
I bet he never thought that his writings would come back to haunt him
@dudleydoright2706
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Was Brett writing about Obama or Bill Clinton, but turns out it involves Donald Trump instead,,,,OOPs.
@Ron-wm9ly
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
if Trump goes to a country that he cannot be extradited from, will his government security go with him??
@MarciaMatthews
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
DJT committed hundreds of crimes while in office. Emoluments, conflicts of interest. He mishandled the Covid crisis, promoted quack theories, and encouraged rallies that were super-spreader events. When he caught Covid he kept it secret and exposed several others.
@barbieyoung6608
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Let's hope this means something…
@dbrown7733
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Ouch! We all knew that "presidential immunity" was bullsh*t. Now, let's proceed with trial!
@gcharouhas
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
It could be argued (and probably will) that what Kavanaugh meant was that IF the President is impeached by Congress AND removed from office, THEN he can be prosecuted.
@jacquesroy3342
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
is this the silent words we have been waiting….sleeping words are now awaken.
@TrishMiller-xt8nr
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Yes, Yes, Yes 😊
@RRL110
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Kavanaugh likely wrote that with Bill Clinton in mind. Their motto is rules are for the lil people and Democrats.
@donaldclifford5763
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
The issue isn't about crimes committed while in office. We're talking about presidential powers, for which he has absolute immunity. Nice try Larry.
@bomccall5148
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
The trash compactor is closing tighter than the USSR/CHINA TRUMP knows.
@e51044
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Typical liberal word twisting to prove their own happy ending even if its a lie. Sir, Did you miss the part about being charged once impeached and removed from office by Congress?? Against his will?? . THEN criminal charges can be brought??? Trump is safe according to this statement of Kavanaughs written opinion.
@danielobrien9502
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
You assume Kavanaugh is a better man than he is. He will do whatever Leonard Leo tells him to do.
@paulseitz672
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Isn’t he one of the justices who stated on camera that he would uphold Roe v Wade? Do we really think that he will honour a 25 year old article? He’ll probably claim that he was drinking beers when he wrote that…
@user-im8jy1np5w
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
If only this is true
@moofamo8768
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Same Kavanaugh who said Roe v Wade was settled law……Kavanaugh has no integrity, sorry to say!!!
@henry6451
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
25 years ago. Totally irrelevant.
@henry6451
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
How is this relevant?
Trump was not impeached.
@michaellust2030
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
An argument will be made that, since the constitutional passage cited says that "the Party convicted" will be liable for indictment, this does not apply to Trump, since he was not convicted. That is the essence of his "double-jeopardy" argument. However, that Fifth Amendment claim must also fail, since it prohibits only being "twice put in jeopardy of life or limb" for the same offense… and an impeachment does not entail any such jeopardy.
@thiawroane
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Except that Kavanaugh is a hypocrite, inveterate liar and alcoholic…so his ruling is NOT worth the paper on which it was printed!
@DianneLizzio
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
OMG this Lawrence guy is getting a little woody over this; isn't he LOL
@JellyBean-lo4sl
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
If only past thoughts mattered.
@jacko413
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Unfortunately, SCOTUS does not remember what they write or say before they become a member of the court. They have selective memory even if there is tape, writings or speech. SCOTUS no longer has integrity.
@herbandlaurashea1767
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
" Ilike beer-" i like this fratboy! Lol
Article 1 – even better!
@ktmurphy3096
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Real research, real reporting. Thanks.
@altoSax4
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
Past statements mean absolutely nothing. Hypocrisy knows NO bounds with these clowns. NONE.
@hjjackson05
December 19, 2023 at 12:54 pm
You may have destroyed the prosecution! Your analysis is without merit the largest flaw being your implication that three of the judges are partisan and will rule along party lines. Judges have to be non-partisan. If one of those three judges is concerned about appearing to be partisan, he just may vote the other way. You ignore the power of the verbs should, appears and seems themselves. "Congress should establish that the president can be indicted….Congress established nothing.
The framers thus appeared to anticipate, not that they DID anticipate.
Those words seem to make the opinion arguable.